MST. ZAHIDA NASREEN versus ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, DISTRICT SAHIWAL
Article 3 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application to remove possession of illicit property Prevention Complaint The applicant filed a private complaint under section 3 of the Unlawful Settlement Act 2005, which allowed him to own the land in dispute. Are. Allegedly to seize the aforementioned land along with his aforesaid petitioner, about six months before his complaint to the grievance body, the culprits seized the land in conflict with a demonstration of criminal power, forcibly and illegally. Was dismissed by the trial court's decision, the applicant and the defendants were acquitted of the trial court's complainant judge and this case was thoroughly examined by the trial court and In each case, litigation was based on the evidence of the complainant being prosecuted. Between the parties and they were joint owners and co-partners, the property of one partner in the common property was to be seized, considered every inch of the property, and the private complaint filed by the applicant only to suppress and dispose of the defendants. , Which was a misuse of Section 3 of the Illegal Arrivals Act. 2005 meant for land grabbers, the Act did not mean for co-owners, land shareholders claimed each of them the title of the disputed land The private complaint appeared false and serious. And the trial court dismissed the complaint and acquitted the plaintiff. By the applicant
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
