AZHAR FAREED versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, PAKPATTAN SHARIF
Article 5, Schedule and Section 14 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application for recovery of recovery allowance and recovery of dowry articles, brother of the plaintiff, who had property in the commercial area and shops and wheat grinding machine. On the way, at the time of the marriage, the plaintiffs had sufficient resources to provide the dowry articles, the receipts for the purchase of the dowry articles were displayed. Ali acknowledged the supply of certain articles in dowry, but refused to set a price trial for such items. The court rejected the evidence and believed only some of the articles which were proved by the plaintiff claimed Rs 2,96,230, but the order was approved in the range of Rs 1,66,700. The lawyer for was unable to identify anyone. Definition of evidence did not amount to illegal retaliation Defendant was out of favor with defendant
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
