Section 497 of the Prevention Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/201/395/34, led to the disappearance of evidence of crime and robbery, the approval of the case was based on circumstantial evidence and Police did not collect any cellular data. It can be inferred that the calls were given by the accused / his accomplice to the complainant and the prosecution witnesses, two of the co-accused were already granted bail by the High Court and the accused claimed the same. Earlier, the accused's request for bail was withdrawn. The High Court directed the trial court to end the trial with a four-month period, but fourteen months had passed; the trial could not be ended, while the fast-moving accused was in favor, in the circumstances.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
