Sections 222 (b) and 4 324 Qatil Ahmed and Attempt to Commit the Case of the Complaint Complicating each other in the challan case and the private complaint by the trial court, the trial court overlooked by the trial court And had mutual interference. The basic scheme of law, as listed in Chapter XXII of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898, and in the general case it was very difficult to separate the two cases, to record the statements of the prosecution witnesses in the report prepared under trial court sanctions. Was bound. Under section 173, the challan case sent by the investigating officer to the Challan case under the CCPC, which was accused of the challan case, was not satisfied with the counter version of the Investigation Officer's incident, which led to his murder. A complaint was filed about The Husband Trial Court recorded the statements of four of the prosecution witnesses in the complaint case and recorded the statements of the three. I was obliged to ask for court testimony during the trial. Reveal that if the complainant applied to seek the above three police officers, the trial court, as a court witness, concluded the trial without recording the statements of the accused persons and resolved the matter with a strong verdict. Went, resulting in a remand. The High Court directed the trial court to record the statements of the witnesses of the remaining accused in the challan case and strictly in accordance with the law.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
