ABID KHAN versus MEMBER JUDICIAL-I, BOARD OF REVENUE PUNJAB, LAHORE
Section 8 West Pakistan Land Revenue Rules, 1968, R19 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Petition Petitioner submitted the appointment of the respondents as Revenue to the Executive District Officer, Revenue, who ordered the District Officer, Revenue. Was set by The applicant also rejected the respondent's request for review as a member of the Board of Revenue, rather than as a member of the Board of Revenue, and upheld the order of the Executive District Officer, therefore, the respondent filed a review request, which the successor member board The Office of Revenue accepted, setting aside its advance order and reinstating the order of the District Officer, whereby the respondent was appointed a limber applicant that the request for review by the respondent was timely. Was imposed and the respondent failed to identify any error in the order of the Member Petitioner He was. Despite the fact that the successor's time was stopped in the request for review, the member did not advertise on the question of limitation. The State Executive District Respondent was not a permanent resident of the Revenue, the Applicant was appointed as a memorandum on the merit order which was approved by the Prior Member, there was no reason to uphold the order. Was mechanical on doing. The order passed by the successor member was also declared a mechanical order as the Executive District Officer, Revenue Matter and its judicial mind did not conform to the facts of the matter as the Member did not have any non-review order in the review order. Legal error or inaccuracy was not identified, nor was it a limitation in response
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
