Section 497 (5) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Sections 454 and 380 of a residence for the conviction of a conviction of imprisonment and theft by a dwelling, or the breaking of a house, only on the finding of a bail cancellation case. Was involved. Only the basis for further investigation was made by Sniffer Dogs to detect Sniffer Dogs so that the original criminal investigating officer should have gathered more evidence for the trial but no concrete, No serious or circumstantial evidence was collected that did not include any local residents. At the time of the detection by the sniffer dog, the complainant had tried to produce the last seen evidence with the introduction of witnesses after confirming the bail prior to the arrest of the suspect, if these witnesses knew of the incident. , They should have appeared before the investigating officer shortly after registration. FIR Police and Complainant Involve Suspect With Disappointing Audit The Owl District Judge assigned reasonable reasons for exercising discretion when once a competent court granted bail in the exercise of his discretion. Needed very strong and extraordinary grounds so the request to cancel the bail was dropped,
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
