Section 656565 is an Anti-Terrorism Act (of XXVII of 1997 XX XX), defining abduction evidence for Section 7 (e) ransom as per their wishes by the complainant against the accused persons, Can be involved in AR. The alleged kidnapper gave very rational answers to the questions he was facing and made a very confident statement that the alleged kidnapper's statement showed that he was fully involved. Defense of the accused could not break the credibility of the alleged kidnappers during cross-examination; witnesses of the other two prosecution also fully involved the accused. What was Which was held to a large extent in accordance with the rules suggested by the High Court witness who alleged that there was no enmity with the accused regarding the payment of the ransom money and his testimony was affected by the trust. There was no reason to make false allegations by the complainant or the prosecution's witnesses. In addition to any suspicion of punishment, the agitation against the three accused involved in the kidnapping of the children, and two of them were present when the ransom money was received. Was. Three suspects were retained under Anti-365A, PPC and Section (e) of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997 as the two main accused were killed in the police encounter and the kidnapped child was luckily recovered. , His conviction was changed under Section 656565A, death from death with benefit of PPC Section 382B, CR PC
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
