MUHAMMAD HANIF versus MEMBER, (S&R) BOARD OF REVENUE
Section 3 of the General Clause Act (XX of 1897), Article 21 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 4, 25 and 199 Constitutional petition submitted vacant land after the sale of land to the applicant, the notification officer approved the cancellation recommendations of the original allotment allotment. It is requested that the purchase of the land be paid upon payment of its value, after the commencement of such order by the Chief of the Settlement Commissioner of Review under section 21 of the General Securities Act, 1897, when it was discovered that By nature, urban land is not available. The sale by applicant to the legitimate record shows that the applicant has been occupying the land from his original allotment, as his clear buyer and was not privy to any fraud, in which case the notification officer has It was recommended to sell the land to the applicant for regular occupation. Neither company had submitted a fraudulent request if it was not available in the present case, then the IRPs in the same position were allowed to sell in the same village, then the applicant would be allowed to sell. Being discriminated against by the law suffered discrimination and cannot be dealt with. Other such persons are still benefiting from the scheme, but only the applicant was selected for this purpose. The Chief Settlement Commissioner for reviewing the order was exceeded by having no power to review, while passing the unlawful order, the applicant prepared the land by spending heavy manual labor and heavy expenses. The main duty of the Islamic State was its subjects
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
