No further inquiry grant was named from the accused in section 497 (2) of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), section 302/392/34 convictions MMD and robbery bail, FIR and it was an anonymous incident No direct evidence was collected by the complainant against. The accused was involved in the first supplementary statement, three persons, who were declared innocent and in the second supplementary statement, which was recorded about two months later, the accused was also involved with his wife and his daughter. There are three versions of this case, which was investigated further, which required investigation of the accused's crime. The last time the evidence was collected through a simple mammogram statement, which was a weak type of evidence, no crime or any weapon was recovered from the accused. Guaranteed, in the circumstances
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
