A. XXXVII, R2 Claim for Recovery Based on Claim Blackmail Plate of Effect Predator for Receipt of Rs. 600,000, Notice of Receipt and Contract Defendants Apply for Vacation Claimed that the trial court, which was subject to providing security in the amount of Rs 650,000 by the trial court, was obtained through promise note and receipt and blackmail of the contract with its signatures. Yes, the trial was filed in the interest of predecessor through blackmail. The plaintiff's position on the plaintiff was that the trial court relied on the defendant's statement alone, which was not substantiated by any other witness. The plaintiff did not inspect any witness except that he appeared as the sole witness on the defendant's sole statement was preferred by the trial court for the seven witness statements without credible reason. Finally, it could not prove that the defendant's defense of the promissory note and the signing of the contract was strictly or under repression or blackmailing the defendant's defense of the case for cancellation of the contract and the promise in the civil court was vacated. Was unbelievable because neither the certified copy of the plaintiff was presented in the said case nor did the defendant have to file his case. The dismissal was aware that the High Court had allowed the appeal
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
