An attempt to commit Section 497 (2) Contempt of Conduct (MLV of 1860), Section 324/34 Qatil Ahmed bail, according to the grant FIR of further investigation, the two accused, who were allegedly armed with carbine and pump action. Were fired at the same time, however, the injuries sustained in the fire were not included in any of the particular ones, the accused were nominated against the accused in the FIR and it is not clear. Who had targeted the injured in the shootings? The FIR is facing two days of unclear delay in filing, in which case the possibility of deliberations cannot be ruled out, after the bail of the accomplices has been granted, the rule of consistency. The accused needs to be guaranteed too, the last time the accused was behind bars. Two years and almost three months passed, but not a single witness of the prosecution was examined in this case, and the suspect had long faced unnecessary detention. The version in the FIR was the suspect's role and the suspect. Doubtless about the benefit of, even in the bail phase, the accused should be granted a bail as there was nothing more prominent than the accused in respect of the merits who had granted the bail, and further investigation into his crime. Is. The accused, whose case was submerged in the mischief of section (2) of section 497, the CCP deserves the accused for the grant of bail, the accused presented the case for bail, he was granted bail, Under the circumstances
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
