MUHAMMAD JAFFAR versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, LAHORE
Sections 15 and 21 (4) (5) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Tenant's tenant's dismissal claims that the shop was purchased through a registered sale deed, the trial court issued a previous eviction order Under which the landlord took possession. The disputed shop tenant filed a petition to withdraw the eviction order. The trial court accepted the petition and ordered the landlord to hand over the vacant house to the tenant. He was accepted by the Court of Appeal, which remanded the case to the trial court, directing the decision of the tenants. After recording the evidence on the main points of both the parties and recording the evidence of the two parties, the petitioner filed a constitutional application against the order of the appellate court under section 21 (4) of the Punjab Tenant Premises Act, 2009 It was said that the previous part order was set correctly. The tenant could no longer be construed as a proper service of notice by the trial court, and requested that the trial court be deemed fit under section 21 (5) of the Punjab Rented Premises Act, 2009, if any If the defendant has shown sufficient cause for his non-submission, the trial court has set aside the legality. The previous eviction order only came to the conclusion that the notice was not presented to the tenant as shown by the relevant record and after the trial court's final results affixed the notice to the server. The tenant's non-submission in the request for settlement, the appellate court's finding on the issue was illegal, false and was subject to material irregularities under Section 21 (5) of the Punjab Rented Primes Act, hence any further evidence or issue.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
