Section 2 302 (b) Definition of Qatil-Umid evidence The benefit of the doubt Medical evidence was not consistent with general testimony At the critical time, the presence of eyewitnesses was suspected that the prosecution had failed to prove the motive of the accused's alleged incident Unless otherwise, the accused's fugitive was not proof of his crime and, although it may be relevant, could not be used to convict him on capital charges alone, when the accounts of the Acqual. Was not trusted and no one was confirmed. Eyewitnesses from other sources had modified their statements in court to supplement the medical evidence. Recovering the rifle from the accused was inevitable, as no crime was cleared by the investigating officer, the suspect was acquitted on the benefit of the suspect. Conditions
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
