SAIF ULLAH KHAN versus MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE COLONIES, PUNJAB, LAHORE
Section 10 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Appeal Reinstatement of Applicants who purchased the land in dispute by conversion until the Judicial Order hearing by the Colonial Officer Land was filed under the Thala Development Act. Adjusted right. That the order passed by the Colonial Officer was not implemented, the applicant transferred the application to the authority to which the Deputy Commissioner and Commissioner reported in favor of the applicant, but stated that the Member, the Board of Revenue Reports were not considered by source and anonymous order. Applicant resumed land in dispute The validity impedance order did not meet the requirements of the prescribed law, under which the order should be spoken, which should include reasons for the authority to conclude, but the improper order was not speaking and the authority did not speak it. No reason was given that the applicant condemned it, having heard it, that the principle of natural justice that no body could hear was violated and that the authority of the law was violated. They are without legal authority. The matter was fraught with controversial facts and applied to the Member Law, which failed to properly investigate. The matter, which has been pending for the past four decades, was remanded to the Member, Board of Revenue, with no legal authority and no jurisdiction over the Impact Executive Order issued by the Board of Revenue. The case was directed to fix the judicial. Provide opportunities for parties to hear
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
