Find a Lawyer

GHULAM MUSTAFA versus STATE

Section 497 of the Control of Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997), section 9 (c) possession of intoxicating bail, the approval of the accused's case is similar to that of the co-accused who had already been granted bail by the High Court. Was also admitted. Guarantee, in view of the rule of consistency

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• ALTAF HUSSAIN v. DISTRICT COORDINATION OFFICER/CHAIRMAN RECRUITMENT COMMITTEE, MUZAFFARGARH 2010 PLC(CS) 697
• GHULAM HUSSAIN v. State 2010 PCrLJ 698
• Mrs. PARVEEN AKHTAR v. DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER (W) ELEMENTARY EDUCATION, JHANG 2010 PLC(CS) 699
• MUHAMMAD NADEEM v. State 2010 YLR 700
• NAZAR MUHAMMAD WARAICH v. ZONAL HEAD, STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN, PARIS ROAD, SIALKOT 2010 PLC(CS) 701
• SAIF ULLAH KHAN v. MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE COLONIES, PUNJAB, LAHORE 2010 YLR 702
• HUSSAIN BAKHSH v. State 2010 PCrLJ 702
• FAZAL KARIM v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, MULTAN 2010 CLC 703

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

registration advocate from Sohawa District Daska lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes