The pre-arrest section 498 Contempt Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 379, was subject to a grant of civil litigation proceedings between the parties, which occurred in the land of the accused before the competent court, which was filed by the FIR I was not involved. , Revealed that it was not established how 70/80 tons of cotton was stolen because there was no mention of tractor trolley or truck in the FIR, only that it was told that 50/60 women were accused of the crime. A similar case was registered against the accused who went away with a cotton complaint, and similar charges were filed in the FIR, in which the accused were also named and the accused and the complainant were eventually mediated by the arbitrator. There was a compromise between the parties. It appears that after the dispute was settled, the complainant withdrew from his action in the arbitration settlement and re-filed the existing FIR by re-filing the same FIR, as in the previous FIR, It was reported that the pesticides were stolen and stolen, which in the present period states that 60/70 mounds of cotton were stolen. The complainant's bead was fully established that he would file an FI only to put pressure on the other party because the civil litigation between the parties was pending, because of this he showed misconduct. In order to turn civil litigation into unlawful criminal litigation, the complainant's false implications for civil litigation between parties and the delay in filing an FIR in such disputes have been Can't be rejected
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
