Section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), compiling Section 324/34 murder bail, has benefited from the suspicion of further investigative grants, though it was named in the FIR for looting and firing on the victim. Character, but he was found innocent during the investigation; there is no doubt that the opinion of the police was not binding on the courts, but the purpose of sanctioning his bail may also be considered, if he too Being a gunman at this point in the presence of independent witnesses cannot be doubted if based on valid reasons and strong evidence. According to the records, nothing is available which shows that the witness made such statement for some higher purpose, the accused was declared as baseless, it was said that the evidence was based on the evidence of the investigating officer. Was not based on these ideas. According to the report of the forensic science laboratory, two spaces allegedly recovered on the spot were fired with a weapon, the motive was also not attributed to the suspect, but it was significant that the suspect was further identified by the co-accused. Only the defendant could not be denied bail for the reasons that the trial could have been taken at any stage, if that was the case, the suspect could have been exploited. The accused and the bail could not be stopped because the convict was admitted to bail, under the circumstances.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
