In section 417 (2A) in the appeal against conviction and the appraisal of evidence in the appeal against the bad, the appeal against the bad discrimination in the appeal against the conviction, the evidence was rigorously examined and in the appeal against the acquittal, There was not a single rigorous method of diagnosis. Applicable; because after a proper analysis of the evidence on record, the trial court was found to have already acquitted. In the appeal to be acquitted, the intervention was made only when it appeared that the evidence had been seriously misinterpreted, including abortion by the Justice High Court. In an appeal against evil, in principle, he will not intervene and instead he will not give proper weight nor consider the decisions of the court so that the acquitted accused does not interfere with the court's solemn injunction. Because it is on re-admissibility of evidence, different from the conclusion of acquittal by the court. Provided that these findings were reasonably possible, the finding of failure was not sacrosanct, if the reasons given by the trial court were speculative or artificial, or the conclusions were not based on any evidence. Or the result of misinterpretation or misinterpretation of the evidence. Or it was concluded that there was a misunderstanding about the culpability or innocence of the allegations, which led to a misunderstanding of justice, that such inquiry could interfere with appropriate matters, appeal against evil. There were specific features. And the approach to dealing with appeals against conviction was distinguished from appeals against evil, since the possibility of dual innocence was later linked to the case when the brigade's order could only be interfered with. When his face was like this, stray
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
