Sections 2 (b), 3, 10 and 13 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Application Stability Process Land owners, after merger, could not obtain the land of their choice and some adjustments were made to achieve the purpose of sustainability. Had to The Holding of the applicant argues that its client has received a low standard of quality and the defendant has been given a high quality status, which has resulted in his holding being divided into two places, apart from the facts. Was also repelled, which cannot cause interference. The dispute in this matter in connection with the consolidation proceedings was related to Section 10 (1) of the West Pakistan Consolidation of Holdings Ordinance, the 1960 record showed that the matter had been dealt with by the Revenue Organization's public officials and after they were examined. Had concluded the question of facts. After scrutinizing the records, keeping in view the relevant requests to the parties as well as other orders, such discovery of rd facts could not be interfered with in the High Court's constitutional jurisdiction where immovable There was no illegality or weakness in the orders.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
