MST. SARWAR MAI versus JUDGE FAMILY COURT, MUZAFFARGARH
Article & Schell Sche and Scale Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Application Marriage Rights Contradictory DNA Test (Deoxyribonucleic Acid Test) Scope The plaintiff alleges that the defendant was not the victim's wife and son who was in favor of the defendant. I was crazy and crazy. The Bogus document was awarded for the trial of the plaintiff by the Family Court decision for the marriage joctification and the decree passed by the Family Court was upheld by the appellate court's DNA test of the subpoena's validity test. Has requested permission to hold and this will not work. Unavoidable delays, no useful purpose other than the density of litigation, which could have led to other complications, could not accept the role of the High Court inquiry into the DNA test itself when the matter was contested with truth. Was opposed, so he could not settle the matter himself. Presenting his refusal would be equivalent to a recent trial on the need to investigate such actions in fact, which is beyond the scope of constitutional jurisdiction, there is no certainty for such a test report. , When the dead body and grave cannot be identified due to a prolonged period of time, and under serious doubts, such an examination can lead to further complications rather than resolution. Therefore, the High Court refused to allow the DNA test, after thoroughly examining all the facts and legal disputes between the parties, from time to time, thoroughly ising all the evidence contained by the parties in the decisions of both courts. Was derived on
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
