Section 2 302 (b) Definition of Evidence Benefit of Doubt The duration of the doctor's visit between the death and post-mortem examination by the doctor was 22 to 24 hours post-mortem examination. The IR was not immediately recorded with the FIR, which was recorded after the initial investigation, could not be used in the account as a disputed piece of evidence, but with proper care and caution. The matter had to be taken into account while the complainant was the victim's real brother, while the prosecution was a witness. Both of the deceased's cousins said the witnesses had a mutual relationship and that there was no doubt that the witnesses were closely related, merely that the eyewitness's relationship was not enough to make them an eyewitness. Was not present, immediately believing the witnesses, but they were obliged to show that they were present on the occasion in the manner described, the prosecution witness who was a resident of different colonies, an opportunity witness. Because the incident did not occur at the time where he could be present as usual. Failure to state the specific reason why the victim and the defendant went on the telephone to call where the prosecution witness failed to show any reason for being present, both the complainant and the prosecution witness satisfied during the cross examination. Failed to show that he was present on the spot The ocular account was not found to be credible because even after recording the sentence in the death penalty case without independent co-operation.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
