MST. BISMA SAFDAR versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Article 25 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application covering the scope of minor welfare The initial application of this guardianship was settled and compromised for the permanent custody of minors under the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890. That the minor be with the defendant / father and that he should be referred to the plaintiff for 24 hours every week and that the father / the defendant pay Rs 500 for the care of the minor, the plaintiff has violated Article 25 of the Act. Another application was filed under Due to a breach of the terms and conditions of the contract, the juvenile whom the Guardian Court dismissed by the plaintiff was dismissed by the Court of Appeal, guarding the minor boy for more than two years, Shi'a law. According to the ruling of the parties, the father is in favor of his father, although he has no independent home in Pakistan but was allegedly employed abroad on a beautiful salary and wished to take his son to study there. Take, Mom was not employed yet and grandmother's resources were modest, with a large number of dependents God wished the boy to meet the needs of the Father does not even regular maintenance to be with the Father. The failure of the child to lie in custody of the father at his present age is not to reject the child's welfare welfare, for any unlawful interference or weakness or misrepresentation of the evidence. Did not indicate that the High Court had sought intervention by the Constitution. Petition dismissed by High Court \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
