Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHARIF versus MUHAMMAD YAQOOB

Sections 6 and 13 of the pre-arrest trial court dismissed the case, while the appellate court ruled in favor of the plaintiff that the plaintiff was not allowed to mention his case and location in describing the case. Failed to perform. Both the witnesses of the land could not even specifically mention the time and place of the sale, when and where they found out about the sale that it was an essential requirement of the law to mention the Tal'awi trustee regarding the time and place. Was to decide the authenticity / authenticity of the appeal. The court, in the circumstances, erred in deciding that the requirements for the arbitration proceedings were met and that a non-judgmental decision was passed in violation of the law, and the order passed by the appellate court was set aside and the trial The judgment and decision passed by the court was restored.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• MUHAMMAD ILYAS v. State 2010 MLD 1282
• PARVEEN AKHTAR v. EX-OFFICIO JUSTICE OF PEACE 2010 MLD 1292
• RIAZ BOTTLERS PVT. LTD. through Tax Manager v. LAHORE ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY (LESCO) through Chief Executive 2010 PTD 1295
• RIZWAN alias ABU-BAKAR v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1296
• MUHAMMAD HANIF v. State 2010 YLR 1300
• IMRAN alias MANI BUTT v. State 2010 YLR 1303
• MUHAMMAD ASIF JAVED v. State 2010 MLD 1305
• Syed WAJIH-UL-HASSAN v. MUHAMMAD KHALID ALVI 2010 PLC(CS) 1308

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

jobs for advocates from Diamer lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes