O xxxth, R1 Convene Evidence (10 of 1984), Article 72 Recovery Pro Note, Proof of Trial Court, Plaintiff sued Plaintiff for recovery of Rs 280,000 in favor of the plaintiff. And the three witnesses, Fingerprint Expert, confirmed their report, according to which they compared the defendant's thumb impression in the affidavit and corroborated the defendant's testimony presented by the plaintiff, but nothing appeared. Proven your case through reliable evidence and defendants. Failure to prove any arbitration decision on the pro note was properly upheld by the trial court against the defendant and the trial court concluded that it was based on reasonable grounds that no No written or proof was read, nor was there any other legal weakness. Identified by the defendant, therefore, the High Court refused to interfere with the decision and smiled in the circumstances allowed by the trial court.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
