The applicant plaintiff filed a claim for specific performance of the sale agreement on section 12 legal evidence (10 of 1984), the controversial signatures and thumb impressions on the Article 84 suit agreement for the specific performance of the contract. Of the Rs 4,400,000 in connection with the disputed property, Rs 3850,000 was paid and the remaining amount was to be paid at the time of execution of the suit against the defendant and the execution of the sale agreement. In addition to the refusal, the trial court dismissed the plaintiff's claim that during the trial, he proceeded to compare the signatures and thumb impressions of the executor of the said contract. The petition was filed before the court, which was erroneously rejected by the trial court as part of the sale agreement. In the same way, the interest in justice can be safely transferred only after the signing of the handwriting and fingerprint expert's plea dismissing the trial proceedings was materially affected and the trial court This issue needs to be fixed as there is no authorization by. The High Court dismissed the appeal after obtaining further remand for the trial court's decision and the decree and request for reconsideration of signatures and thumb impressions.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
