Husband wrote on 14 11 2002 for the rehabilitation of the wife under the section & & and the Muslim Family Laws Ordinance (VIII of 19 1961), Constitution Constitution Constitution Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Request Suite The statement stated that he had already divorced the plaintiff. Therefore, she was unable to pass a previous order through the Family Court because of her failure to produce evidence to the husband, in addition to the purchase of her stamp paper on the copy of the divorce filing before the High Court. No execution date was shown. In 2002, Tallahassee, with her husband, was verbally announced in October 2001 in the presence of witnesses, which was later reduced to writing. And that despite the issuance of the divorce certificate of the wife, the oral divorce would prove to be effective because the alleged divorce is a fake / fraudulent document, which was neither presented to the Family Court nor sent to the Union Council for the issuance of the divorce certificate. went. All such facts show that the husband was only getting time to refrain from paying the order, which has come to the conclusion that there was no refusal to search the matter of realism, which the husband Can lift Before being executed by the court, the High Court dismissed the constitutional petition in the circumstances if it was advised that the said judgment and injunction did not face any illegal interference. \ R \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
