Sections 302 (b), 324 and 337a (iii) / 34 of the trial court's attempt to compel murders and testimony of evidence was the original brother of the convict, the victim, the complainant's reduction supported the prosecution's story. , There was no previous rivalry between it. The accused, the prosecution witness and the accused complainant were an independent witness who had no intention of falsely executing the accused in the case; the other two witnesses of the prosecution were not from the deceased or the complaining party, but only the complainant. The party had friendly relations and said that witnesses could not be interpreted as interested witnesses. The witnesses said there was no suspicion in the presence of the witnesses as they suffered serious injuries during the incident. The presence of witnesses on the occasion was beyond any doubt and they made a permanent statement. The three eyed witnesses were subjected to lengthy cross-examination, but the defense was unable to obtain anything in its favor and any fault in the school. Was unable to create. In fact, it came to light of the time of day in which both sides were injured and each other knew that there was no possibility of any kind of retaliation for the accused. Cannot go to unexpected account. To the extent of the accused, the circumstances were completely reliable and reliable and were obtained with the help of medical evidence, not specifically denied by the defense of the time and place of the incident. Recovery of a weapon from a co-accused, however, cannot be used as a correction. Forensic Science Laboratory Report
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
