Sections 337A (i), 337F (i) and 337F (v) Criminal Code of Conduct (V. 1898), Section 439 wounding accused and his accomplices, who have been tried and convicted, Revised them against punishment and punishment. In the review case there was a compromise between the parties and the complaining party forgave both the accused and the accused were acquitted and they were acquitted of the charge, the other co-accused allegedly killed Danda. Was. The complainant used the weapon by a co-accused was a common practice that was not a deadly weapon. The co-accused had no evidence of Section 337 (2), previous conviction in the PPC jurisdiction, habitual or severe, frustrated or dangerous offender. Or was not the former. So as to draw an optional additional sentence of imprisonment because the aforementioned co-defendant's televised revocation request was excluded to the extent of his conviction under section 337F (i), PPC, but that was a part. ? Lear was allowed to imprison him as a businessman, which was declared unnecessary by law, under which Daman paid a fine of Rs 1,000 saying that the co-accused was retained and told Was a co-accused who had already been admitted on bail at the time of review, Daman was directed to deposit the required amount within the specified period.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
