Section 2302 / Cri 34 Criminal Code (v. 1898), Section 417 (2) Special leave for appeal, denying that the victim disclosed the names of the accused who fired at him, the names of the FI There was no doubt that the accused was either found guilty during the investigation and nothing was recovered from the investigation, either in the RR or in a statement issued under section 161. No, the police opinion was not binding on the court, but it would also weigh in particular where the names of the accused were not given. The medical evidence of the FIR was in complete opposition to the story presented in the FIR and the story was also put forward in the private complaint after 2/2 years, not even explaining the delay in filing the complaint. Gone, the double charge of being innocent was linked to his acquittal. There will be no interference by any competent court and superior courts unless the order of acquittal is arbitrary, arbitrary, fraudulent and against the record unless the verdict from the re-examination of different points of view arises. I will not be enough to justify any interference. The defendant's immunity by the Sessions Court was not based on contradictory or serious reasons, whereby the special leave of appeal was refused.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
