Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD NAWAZ ALIAS MAAJI versus STATE

Section 2302 (b) conviction of convicted AMD evidence not delayed in the termination of the FIR The FIR alleged that it had specifically fired at the man on the left side of his chest, This was confirmed by both eyes. Witnesses were also included in the complaint case, in which Ocular evidence also supported medical evidence and convincing conviction. The contradictory and medical evidence in the ocular account was of a technical nature, the natural witnesses of the incident could not break the testimony, in the circumstances the conviction of the crime was maintained while improving his statements during the trial The defendant was subjected to another specific shot to the right, and he also declared certain firearms wounds to be attributed by prosecutors to the fact that his sentence had not been proved. The death of the accused was changed to life imprisonment under the circumstances

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• MEHWISH ASLAM v. S.H.O. 2010 YLR 2157
• Mst. AZRA BIBI v. CHIEF SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER, PUNJAB, LAHORE 2010 YLR 2159
• CHAMAN DIN v. State 2010 YLR 2168
• SAFDAR ALI v. State 2010 YLR 2184
• MUHAMMAD YASIN v. GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB through Secretary Housing and Physical Planning Department 2010 YLR 2207
• Mst. SHAMIM GHAFFAR v. GHULAM SHABBIR 2010 YLR 2216
• GHULAM SARWAR v. PROVINCE OF PUNJAB 2010 YLR 2225
• ABDUL GHAFFAR alias BILLA v. State 2010 YLR 2228

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

advocates from Lahore lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes