Section 115, O VII, R 11 & O XXXVII, Rr 1, 2 In the absence of due to illegal proceedings after the case, the defendant issued checks in favor of the plaintiff and on the basis of which the checks were dishonored. The case was filed on the plaintiff. At the time of the approval of the suit, there were attempts to reject the request based on the agreements between the parties. From the contents of the suit, a cause of action was disclosed in favor of the plaintiff, including the effectiveness of the events that occurred and the disclosure of certain facts. The agreements, conditions and purposes for which the agreements have been implemented will be subject to scrutiny in the light of the evidence presented to the trial court, even after recording the evidence of both parties capable of determining the effect of the agreements. Will be. Due to the appearance of subsequent agreements on the suit filed by the plaintiff, the cause of action was not terminated in favor of the plaintiff NDO was not responsible for dismissing the lawsuit filed under the provisions of XIII. And it was a lasting order that the order passed by the trial court did not face any kind of illegal interference or revocation of material misconduct.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
