BANK OF PUNJAB versus PUNJAB LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, LAHORE
Sections 45 (4) and 47 of the Industrial Relations Act (IV of 2008), Sections 57 (4), 86 and 87 (2) (b) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), Section 30 (4) of the High Court (Lahore) Rules and Orders, Volume V, Chap 1, Part A, Rr 9 and 9a Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Sections 5 and 12 of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional petition under the High Court against the order of the Labor Court Appeal to the Court With the expiration of the limits set out under section 47 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 2002, the appeal of the appeal by the High Court to remove the objections within six days and additionally Section 5 of the Limitation Act 1908 Hurt by the High Court Office with the request under Condolences to the appellant that after the appeal was approved by the Labor Appeal Tribunal, after the appeal was approved by the Labor Appellate Tribunal, the transfer of the appeal from the High Court to the Labor Appellate Tribunal under section 86 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 2008 Was. This restriction is imposed on section 34 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, section 34 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 2002 and section 53 (4) of the Industrial Relations on the basis of non-objection to judicial fees on labor cases. Objections by the Office of the High Court were unnecessary. The withdrawal of an appeal by the High Court Office in the Act, ??? Val, would mean that its filing was invalid, therefore, the appeal has been established for purposes of limitation It cannot be considered that the removal of the objection. The time specified by the Office of the High Court will not exceed this limit. The period from the date of filing an appeal by the High Court Office to the filing of an appeal shall not be excluded under the Limitation Act, 1908. Challenges the appellant to such objection before the High Court
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
