Find a Lawyer

HASSAN SHAH versus SHAHZADA KHAN

O. XVI, R 1 (2) Gilgit-Baltistan (Authority and Sovereignty) Order, 2009, Article 60 (13) Request for a witness to be summoned under O XVI, R 1 (2); Did not show any reason for Neither the witnesses mentioned in the list of witnesses nor the evidence of these witnesses were necessary for the decision only, the full details of the witnesses were not mentioned in the petition. It turned out that the applicant intended to prolong the trial proceedings, moving such an incomplete and ambiguous request. The appeal was dismissed

Related judgments — Supreme Appelate Court Gilgit, 2010

• SALAMAT JAN v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, GILGIT 2010 GBLR 314
• ISLAMIC INVESTMENT CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY, ALIABAD v. SULTAN ISHAQ, EX. GENERAL MANAGER, ISLAMIC CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY 2010 GBLR 317
• JUDGES OF CHIEF COURT 2010 GBLR 322
• GHULAM QADIR v. GHULAM ABBAS 2010 GBLR 325
• TAJAN v. ABDUL MAJEED 2010 GBLR 328
• Syed SAROOSH HAIDER RIZVI v. NAB 2010 GBLR 329
• MUHAMMAD v. ABDUR REHMAN 2010 GBLR 330
• CLIC v. PAK. CHINA C&MC. (PVT.) LTD. 2010 GBLR 331

All Supreme Appelate Court Gilgit judgments of 2010 →

famous high court advocate from Lalshanra lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes