Find a Lawyer

INAM-UL-HAQUE versus STATE

During the hearing, the counsel for the Section 497 bail application for the petitioner pointed out that the eligibility of the petitions for bail was not decided before the Chief Justice, but was rejected before the Appellate Court of the Supreme Court. The petition was not heard in court, the applicant may move before the Chief Court or before the trial court. A fresh bail application \ r \ n

Related judgments — Supreme Appelate Court Gilgit, 2010

• QAMAR ABBAS v. VICE CHANCELLOR KIU 2010 GBLR 417
• SUO MOTU CASE NO.1 OF 2009 2010 GBLR 418
• SUO MOTU CASE NO.5 OF 2009 2010 GBLR 419
• SUO MOTU CASE NO. 6 OF 2010 2010 GBLR 420
• PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary, Gilgit-Baltistan v. SAFAR KHAN 2010 GBLR 423
• ZAFAR IQBAL MD NACTO, GILGIT-BALTISTAN v. MUHAMMAD NASEEM 2010 GBLR 424
• MUHAMMAD NASIM v. ZAFAR IQBAL 2010 GBLR 425
• HASAN SADPARA v. GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through Ministry of Defence 2010 GBLR 426

All Supreme Appelate Court Gilgit judgments of 2010 →

online advocate from Mingora lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes