Find a Lawyer

HASAN SADPARA versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN THROUGH MINISTRY OF DEFENCE

Article 60 (13) Petition for leave of appeal for a writ of jurisdiction before the Chief Justice's jurisdiction After rejecting the review petition before the Chief Justice, the applicant could not petition the writ jurisdiction before the same court on the same subject. In spite of the fact that the full verdict was not written, a short order will be given in this case, in which case the lawyer seeking legal status will be referred before the Supreme Court for further settlement of the matter. Instead, it submitted that the applicant would raise all questions of law and fact. At the appropriate stage before the relevant court at the appropriate time. And the Supreme Appeal Court will not put any further pressure on the petition before it is settled

Related judgments — Supreme Appelate Court Gilgit, 2010

• INAM-UL-HAQUE v. State 2010 GBLR 422
• PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary, Gilgit-Baltistan v. SAFAR KHAN 2010 GBLR 423
• ZAFAR IQBAL MD NACTO, GILGIT-BALTISTAN v. MUHAMMAD NASEEM 2010 GBLR 424
• MUHAMMAD NASIM v. ZAFAR IQBAL 2010 GBLR 425
• SUO MOTU CASE NO.9 OF 2009 2010 GBLR 427
• ZAHEER KHAN v. PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary, Gilgit-Baltistan 2010 GBLR 429
• SUO MOTU CASE NO.13 OF 2010 2010 GBLR 430
• GHUFRAN GUL v. IMDAD HUSSAIN 2010 GBLR 430

All Supreme Appelate Court Gilgit judgments of 2010 →

divorce advocates from Bat Khela lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes