Find a Lawyer

ZAHEER KHAN versus PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY, GILGIT-BALTISTAN

Article 60 (13) appeals for leave to appeal the civil service director's education, appearing in person, stating that he had advised the Advocate General that due to misunderstanding the court could pass any order. ? And regrettably it was submitted that the applicant was an Emergency Employee and would be adjusted / restored accordingly, however, the Director Education has stated that under the policy and financial status, the applicant will be adjusted against the regular position. Will He was then disposed of in his right for leave to appeal at the same time

Related judgments — Supreme Appelate Court Gilgit, 2010

• ZAFAR IQBAL MD NACTO, GILGIT-BALTISTAN v. MUHAMMAD NASEEM 2010 GBLR 424
• MUHAMMAD NASIM v. ZAFAR IQBAL 2010 GBLR 425
• HASAN SADPARA v. GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through Ministry of Defence 2010 GBLR 426
• SUO MOTU CASE NO.9 OF 2009 2010 GBLR 427
• SUO MOTU CASE NO.13 OF 2010 2010 GBLR 430
• GHUFRAN GUL v. IMDAD HUSSAIN 2010 GBLR 430
• SUO MOTU CASES NOS. 16 AND 17 OF 2010 2010 GBLR 432
• SUO MOTU CASE NO.1 OF 2008 2010 GBLR 436

All Supreme Appelate Court Gilgit judgments of 2010 →

power of attorney advocate Mehar lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes