Sections 12 and 54 were in relation to the specific performance of the agreement and the suit for the plaintiff's permanent injunction, which proceeded to his house, which was closed by the defendants in accordance with the plaintiff's proceedings, and the parties settled the matter under the agreement. What was the agreement The plaintiff was that the defendants did not adhere to the terms of the agreement, which compelled the plaintiff to file a lawsuit, which itself was exhausted from any evidence the parties had intended to present. , The local commission proceedings were present along with the record as well as the commission report. With the court material available on record, the decision of the case was sufficient to decide the case one way or the other on remand, but for the appointment of another commission, the second remand of the case would only increase the harassment of both parties. Were running cases against. No appellate court information on the merits of the 1999 case was on record. The High Court refused to enter the remand of the case to the Appellate Court to decide the merits and circumstances of the case, which was deemed appropriate by the Appellate Court for the first appeal decision. And the appeal was returned to the appellate court. After providing the opportunity for a fair hearing to the parties, they will decide the appeal within the specified time period
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2010
