Section 497 (5) of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), section 496 A / 506 abduction bail, cancellation of application for delay of up to ten hours in filing a report to the police was not defined by the complainant as fuzzy explained. That was the case. For the cancellation of bail, strong and unusual grounds were required to be proved by the complainant, the complainant could not prove that the alleged abductor was already married, even if the alleged marriage was proved (which was not proved). ), Yet its authenticity may be questioned, because on the day of the incident, the kidnapper's age was reported as 12/13 years. The kidnapper, in the circumstances, was trivial at that time and had to perform it during a minority complaint. The plaintiff had the right to reject the marriage but failed to prove any strong and unusual circumstances which required the accused to cancel the bail. Yes, no material was available on e-record to indicate that any accused misappropriated bail privileges or tampered with the investigation of this case.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2010
