Section 497 (5) Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), section 302/324/34 attempt to abolish amnesty and bail, the request for a guaranteed cancellation shall not be canceled in the ordinary course once it is approved by the competent court. Should be done But, if the order of bail was clearly illegal, false, in fact wrong and it led to a misunderstanding of justice, then the intervention of the Supreme Court was always necessary in the present case for the accused to be superior to the law and his trial. Waiting for the outcome of the hearing. Co-accused who faced trial. And it was only after the co-accused was acquitted, either he surrendered or the police trial court granted the defendant's bail on the simple basis that his character was badly similar to the co-accused, unlawful on both. Was charged with effective firing. Such behavior of fugitive suspects was never encouraged by the high courts; it is likely that the trial against the accused may begin in the near future, the High Court has submitted for a long absence of the accused for more than two years. Appeared, refused to enter into the trial's merits. Bail was not entitled to a concession on the bail The release of the lower court accused on bail was a violation of the principles of law, which encourages law-abiding institutions to lend a benefit / concession to defame the law. An order passed by the trial court, expressly illegal, false, factually incorrect and the result of a miscarriage of justice, dismissed by the accused
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2010
