Section 12 Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), AXLI, R31 suit for specific performance of the sale contract was simultaneously rejected by both courts below the validity, as well as on record by the plaintiffs. Documented evidence was also shown. The defendant had considered the disputed amount, but later withdrew from the performance of his part of the contract, the defendant himself did not appear in court, but he recorded this statement through his general attorney, who had filed his statement. Served as Chief of Inspection. The fact of the defendant's entry into the sale for bargaining was confirmed, but according to him a small amount was inserted in Patwari's journal, but the written evidence of some facts could not be corroborated by an oral claim. The evidence on the record fully proved that the defendant / seller after considering the sale of immovable money and that defendant put the signature on the Daily Diary instead of selling it to a contentious supporter. Was the percentage of the plaintiffs / holders, sold to another person and both the courts below the plaintiffs / orders Voters were found to be entitled to the disputed amount only, the courts below granted the right against the plaintiff in favor of the plaintiffs / defendants. There was no irregularity, illegal, misreading and absence of evidence to read, no interference from the High Court was required in the review, in the circumstances
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2010
