Attempts to compile Section 497 of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Section 324/34 murder, denied the defendant's argument that the final report submitted by the investigating officer contained another version of the cross-version. , Which was not believed and the difference between the number of injured and the number of accused was not accepted. In the present case, it is yet to be decided whether the second case was a cross-case or not. Nor was Victum present in court on an important issue, his neck was covered with plaster and there was an injury to the left side of his neck. The bullet was still inside and he had not yet been expelled from the Victim, who appeared to be undergoing treatment. He was about 14/15 years old. The victim had shown that the accused intended to kill him. Because the injury was on the most important part of the body. Given the bruising on the neck of the affected girl, this was a brutal attempt in her life. The facts, if any, were unheard of.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2010
