Sections 6, 13, 31 and 32 of the Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), O VII, R 11, the application for a pre-arrest trial for defendant's defendant was filed under O VII, R 11, CPC, so that There will be a time limit for rejecting an appeal. Defendant, in his petition, testified that the sale had changed on 6 5 on 2008 and was confirmed on 14 5 2008, the case was filed on 26 9 2008, which would mean That the case was filed 4 months and 20 days after the mutation was entered and within 120 days, 4 months and 12 days after the confirmation of the change under Section 31 (b) of the Northwestern Frontier Province Pre-Emission Act, 1987 A pre-emption claim was to be filed if the sale process was effected through a registered process or a sales mutation. The trial court dismissed the case filed by the plaintiff to accept the petition filed by the plaintiff, but the plaintiff filed an appeal against the judgment and order passed by the appellate court. But, the decision is pending. And the order was passed by the trial court and the trial was made for the trial court. The Appellate Court's impugned decision of the Northwest Frontier Province Pre-Impression Act, 1987, against the essential provisions of section 31 of the North-West Frontier Province Pre-Impression Act, was illegal. 1987 and the appellate court's decision was set aside and the judgment and order passed by the trial court were restored.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2010
