The repeal of section 497 (5), the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), the repeal of sections 324/148/149, the application for the principles of bail was quite different from the rules for the cancellation of bail already approved. The request for bail cancellation will only require the defendant to consider the point where the bail was misused or the evidence was tampered with by the accused and the court had to prove extraordinary grounds for the cancellation of the bail. Have to see if there are strong and unusual grounds. There was no illegal or factual error in the charge of interfering with the bail order in favor of the accused and no material was available to prove that the grant of bail was the result of a miscarriage of justice. Grounds required for cancellation. The bail was not available in this case. The complainant suffered a firearm which was also an unimportant part of the body. The body said that because of the sole injury, there was no definite question whether the accused had killed the complainant. Was intended to do so, this would require further investigation; the complainant did not succeed in convincing the court that the accused had either used the wrongful bail exception or had been tampered with. No strong and unusual reasons were identified to justify the cancellation of the evidence bail, even on the merits, by a non-hearing order, the defendant's bail was valid and resulted in no wrongdoing. Because it was a matter of further investigation, the cancellation request for bail was dismissed, in the circumstances
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2010
