MULTAN KHAN versus RIAZ DIN, INSPECTOR/SHO DUAABA POLICE STATION, HANGU
Section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 324/353/34 of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7, Assassination, Conduct, Weapons Attempts to commit and terrorist activity, no further investigations into the bailout were recorded on the record that any of the policemen reportedly received any injuries as a result of the alleged shootings. The question is whether the accused fired at the police party or not? Further investigations are needed, as none of the police personnel were injured as a result of the shooting. In fact, the accused had suffered a firearm injury as a result of the shooting of the police party, which was alleged to have been recovered from ineffective shootings. The crime was seized by Kalashnikov's accused under section 13 of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance, 1965, which was guaranteed
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2010
