Appeal for the principles of section 497 (5) Contempt Code (XLV of 1860), attempt to commit section 324/34 murder, cancellation of bail, cancellation of bail, and application of bail already approved by a competent court. Needed strict reasons to return. The cancellation of bail required strong and extraordinary grounds which are not available in the present case. The approval of the accused bail was found to be based on proper reasons as the fire was caused by the injury to the unnecessary part of the complainant's body. Was not repeated. Despite the opportunities available to the accused and the fact that the suspect's intention to kill the complainant had been questioned, further investigation was made in the case, in which case the cancellation of the bail application is not authorized on this basis. Was that the applicant could not benefit from the order. The High Court under which the accused's bail pre-arrest bail was canceled, as the matter was in the process of canceling the sanction of bail before the verdict was made, while the case of P Naraj was dealt with bail after arrest and various The principles / parameters were applied and the present case was related to the cancellation of the guarantee which had to be dealt with again on different grounds, including strong and extraordinary reasons.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2010
