Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD RAUF KHAN ALIAS ABDUR RAUF KHAN versus MUHAMMAD ASHRAF


The decision challenging the application of Sections 12 (2) and 115 and the application related to the fraudulent petition challenged the Applicants in their revision application to the judgment and decree under which section 12 (2) filed its application under section 12 (2). Under 12 (2), the expression was excluded. The CPC was based on a fraudulent plea that contained a dispute of facts and could not be decided, unless the court recorded a decision that was not based on the evidence, unless the evidence was recorded. Was, for the truth cannot be questioned. Before the court decided without the evidence of the parties, before the affected search was excluded by the court and the case was remanded for recording of the evidence presented by the parties. Was.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
online advocate from Khanbel lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.