Arts 199 and 204 contempt of court Ordinance (IV of 2003), section 3/5 petition to initiate contempt of court proceedings alleging that the petitioner, who is divorced from the wife of the controversial owner, contradicted the High Court decision. In violation, it was constitutionally approved. In the request, the defendant's shop and a room were occupied, while he was not the legal heir of the deceased's divorced wife before the death of the deceased, the respondents resisted in the request that the petition The passenger has no locus standi nor has any right. Or was he not interested in the property in dispute, nor was he the legal heir of the slain owner's counselor, the defendant stated that the defendant was an old lady of seventeen years of age and that the mentally disabled son was taking care of the counselor for the defendant. Is. , If any of the deceased owner's legal heirs approach the defendant, they will vacate the house in dispute The Additional Advocate General also requested the modification of the opposition on the ground that the applicant has no locus standi. And that the state was the owner of the property in connection with the illegal property, none of the lawyers in the dispute had claimed that the defendant had claimed that he would not sell, transfer or separate the property in dispute. And if any of the deceased owner's legal heirs are present at the scene, they will hand over the property to them, in view of which no contempt action can be taken to provide respondents with an accommodation that was an old woman and He had a mentally disabled son, the property applicant in dispute
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2010
