A VII, R 11, O XIV, R 2 & O XXXIX, Rr 1, 2 Trial Trial The trial court dismissed the case while the plaintiff under O XXXIX, RR 1 & 2 In deciding the petition, the CPC plaintiff argued that the trial court could not be denied. The validity of the trial circle without evidence O XXXX, refusal to adjudicate the hearing set for the decision on the application under RR 1 & 2, after the formation of the case, CPC was illegal and unlawful. R may decide the case on questions of law. 2, CPC but even in this case, the court should have provided the parties with an opportunity to hear and prove the case under oh VII, R 11, the CPC could refuse to disclose the reason for the plaintiff's action. And not for non-acceptance of reasons. The latter recording of the evidence required the question of determining and limiting the collection or non-collection of the cause of action, therefore, it was not legal or appropriate to deny these points without recording the evidence, The case was remanded to the trial court after the trial
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2010
