AIJAZ ALI versus SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN, LABOUR AND MANPOWER DEPARTMENT, QUETTA
Section 5 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 General Clause Act (X9 of 1897), Section 21 Constitutional Appointment Principle Locus poenitentiae Applied Scope Department advertised for the position of Assistant and Applicant in the office as Junior Clerk. Serving in this field, considering himself eligible for the post of office assistant, posed as a post-committee candidate, tested and interviewed, recommending that two candidates be on the waiting list for the post. Done, subject to the availability of the office assistant position. In the near future, the petitioner claimed that since he had qualified for the interview, the recommendation made by the committee was compulsory and because the vacancies were vacant, he was entitled to the appointment of a solicitor. The payer's lawyer put a lot of pressure on the principle of luxuriousness, claiming the proposal had legal implications, and in view of Estepel's law, authorities were obliged to respect his recommendations. Applicants for accuracy were not qualified for a variety of reasons. Previously, a committee was created for the limited purpose of examinations and interviews for the created, available and published positions. The Committee cannot be considered as an authority to recommend for any post, not in existence; secondly, such recommendations were beyond the mandate and authority of the Committee. Thirdly, the applicant himself declared the recommendations partially based on malafide recommendations, an attempt was made by the applicant to enforce his recommendations; in the circumstances, he had no legal sanctity nor The Committee has been empowered for this matter
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2010
