Section 42 and 54 Convene Evidence (10 of 1984), Arts 74, 75, 76, 77 and 78 request the plaintiff to present a secondary evidence requesting the review of the specific performance of the suit agreement and the preparation of secondary evidence for a permanent injunction Was rejected. In the present case, the trial court had relied on the sale agreement which was allegedly executed in relation to the property between him and the claimant, claiming that the original sale agreement had been terminated and his Despite efforts, he was not traced. And he intended to prove that by secondary evidence. Under the law under Article 76 of the 1984 law of Sun, Article 1984, if an original document is lost, evidence can be produced to prove its existence and its contents, however, in the present case the plaintiff has applied. Was filed. For more than two years after the document was lost, the Plaintiff for the preparation of secondary evidence had to establish the existence of dissenting persons and the question was not raised in the first case between the parties, after which he had to make the claim. That the document contained in it was lost without error, which led to his being entitled to present secondary evidence in connection with the same trial. Where the plaintiff failed to file a lawsuit in his favor, his review request was dismissed
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2010
